Multi-criteria Argumentation-Based Decision Making within a BDI Agent
نویسندگان
چکیده
The BDI model, as a practical reasoning architecture aims at making decisions about what to do based on cognitives notions as beliefs, desires and intentions. However, during the decision making process, BDI agents also have to make background decisions like choosing what intention to achieve next from a set of possibly conflicting desires; which plan to execute from among the plans that satisfy a given intention; and whether is necessary or not to reconsider current intentions. With this aim, in this work, we present an abstract framework which integrates a Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming [1] approach to decision making in the inner decision processes within BDI agents.
منابع مشابه
A Framework for Multi-criteria Argumentation-Based Decision Making within a BDI Agent
The BDI model, as a practical reasoning architecture aims at making decisions about what to do based on cognitives notions as beliefs, desires and intentions. However, during the decision making process, BDI agents also have to make background decisions like choosing what intention to achieve next from a set of possibly conflicting desires; which plan to execute from among the plans that satisf...
متن کاملPractical Reasoning in an Argumentation-based Decision BDI Agent: a Case Study for Participatory Management of Protected Areas
This paper describes the implementation of an argumentation system used for participatory management of environmental protected areas, more precisely to model the decision of a park manager artificial agent. This implementation is based on a BDI agent architecture, namely the Jason/AgentSpeak framework/language. After introducing the principles of BDI architecture and of argumentation systems, ...
متن کاملMulti-Agent Decision Making with Assumption-based Argumentation
Much research has been devoted in recent years to argumentationbased decision making. However, less attention has been given to argumentation-based decision making amongst multiple agents. We present a multi-agent decision framework based on Assumptionbased Argumentation. In our model, agents have goals and decisions have attributes which satisfy goals. Our framework supports agents with differ...
متن کاملAgent Decision Making Using Argumentation About Actions
In this paper we consider how a BDI agent might determine its best course of action. We draw on previous work which has presented a model of persuasion over action and extends the account of Walton. We propose a formalism based upon this model which extends the BDI agent architecture to include the notion of value functions. This enables us to make use of an argumentation framework in order to ...
متن کاملDialogical two-agent decision making with assumption-based argumentation
Much research has been devoted in recent years to argumentationbased decision making. However, less attention has been given to argumentation-based decision making amongst multiple agents. We present a multi-agent decision framework based on Assumptionbased Argumentation. In our model, agents have goals and decisions have attributes which satisfy goals. Our framework supports agents with differ...
متن کامل